Trademark: 85102761
Word
SWEET PEA ISN'T YOUR "SWEET PEA" WORTH IT?
Status
Dead
Status Code
604
Status Date
Friday, May 17, 2013
Serial Number
85102761
Mark Type
3000
Filing Date
Monday, August 9, 2010
Published for Opposition
Tuesday, August 2, 2011
Abandoned Date
Friday, May 17, 2013

Trademark Owner History
Urbas, Nancy - Owner At Publication

Classifications
25 Cloth diapers; Inserts specially adapted for cloth diapers made of bamboo; Inserts specially adapted for cloth diapers made of hemp; Inserts specially adapted for cloth diapers made of microfiber
The color(s) light green, dark green, light purple, dark purple, pink, black, and beige is/are claimed as a feature of the mark.
The mark consists of the wording "Sweet Pea Isn't Your "Sweet Pea" Worth It?" and a drawing of a baby laying in a cradle that resembles a pod or a hammock (hereinafter, cradle/pod/hammock), having a flower at one end of the cradle/pod/hammock. The cradle/pod/hammock where the baby is laying is light green, with stripes in darker green; the baby has eyes in the color black, dimples in the color pink, a smile and a lock of hair in the color dark purple; the baby's face is in the color beige; all writing matter, the clothing on the baby, and the flower on the cradle/pod/hammock are in the color light purple.
SWEET PEA IS NOT YOUR "SWEET PEA" WORTH IT?

Trademark Events
Aug 12, 2013
Abandonment Notice Mailed - Inter Partes Decision
May 17, 2013
Abandonment - After Inter Partes Decision
Aug 12, 2013
Reg. Cancelled - Restored To Pendency
Jul 30, 2013
Assigned To Petition Staff
Jul 23, 2013
Request To Cancel Inadvertently Issued Registration Received
Jul 23, 2013
Opposition Dismissed No. 999999
Jun 25, 2013
Registered-Principal Register
May 17, 2013
Ttab Release Case To Trademarks
May 17, 2013
Opposition Terminated No. 999999
May 17, 2013
Opposition Dismissed No. 999999
Nov 21, 2011
Opposition Instituted No. 999999
Aug 12, 2011
Extension Of Time To Oppose Received
Aug 2, 2011
Official Gazette Publication Confirmation E-Mailed
Aug 2, 2011
Published For Opposition
Jun 30, 2011
Law Office Publication Review Completed
Jun 27, 2011
Approved For Pub - Principal Register
Jun 24, 2011
Teas/Email Correspondence Entered
Jun 24, 2011
Correspondence Received In Law Office
Jun 22, 2011
Teas Response To Suspension Inquiry Received
Jun 20, 2011
Notification Of Inquiry As To Suspension E-Mailed
Jun 20, 2011
Inquiry To Suspension E-Mailed
Jun 20, 2011
Suspension Inquiry Written
Jun 3, 2011
Lie Checked Susp - To Atty For Action
Jun 3, 2011
Assigned To Lie
Apr 1, 2011
Teas Change Of Correspondence Received
Dec 1, 2010
Notification Of Letter Of Suspension E-Mailed
Dec 1, 2010
Letter Of Suspension E-Mailed
Dec 1, 2010
Suspension Letter Written
Dec 1, 2010
Examiner's Amendment Entered
Dec 1, 2010
Notification Of Examiners Amendment E-Mailed
Dec 1, 2010
Examiners Amendment E-Mailed
Dec 1, 2010
Examiners Amendment -Written
Nov 24, 2010
Assigned To Examiner
Aug 13, 2010
Notice Of Design Search Code And Pseudo Mark Mailed
Aug 12, 2010
New Application Office Supplied Data Entered In Tram
Aug 12, 2010
New Application Entered In Tram

Trademark Alertz updated from USPTO on 2030-01-24